View all Blog posts »

Katie + Cruise + Broadway = Kidman?

May 19, 2008 8:23:02 PM

Post a Comment (606)

KatieHolm_Jesse_15535802_400 Katie Holmes & Tom Cruise / WireImage

Does any of this sound familiar?  Young (relatively unknown) actress marries box office heartthrob and Scientology loony.  Her marriage and personal life are spread across the tabloid covers.   A family follows quickly for the young starlet.  She slowly builds a film career with several well selected roles (indie leads and supporting parts with Hollywood big wigs).  Then, to lend her credibility and legitimate actress "street cred", she nabs a role in a high profile Broadway play.

Oh, you probably thought I was talking about Nicole Kidman.   Nope, I was referring to Ms. Katie Holmes-Cruise.   Holmes is copying another page out of Ms. Nicole Kidman-Cruise-Urban's playbook and will soon star in a new production of the classic Arthur Miller play All My Sons on Broadway.

Is she really going to replicate the career of Nicole Kidman play by play?  What is next for her; Moulin Rouge 2The Hours-Revisited and Cold Mountain: Up the Other Side?  I cannot take it!  I am seriously waiting for TomKat to announce that they are shooting a movie together (a la Far and Away with Kidman).  I am sure they are talking about that at this very moment (dare I suggest Near and Away).

Here are the facts.  Producers have finally confirmed that Ms. Holmes will face the footlights this fall in a revival of one of the theater's most beloved and respected plays, All My Sons.  Written by, arguably, one of theater's greatest legends (he wrote a few little plays you might have heard of, Death of a Salesman and The Crucible).  Joining her in this venture will be two-time Tony Award winner, three-time Emmy winner and twice Oscar nominated John Lithgow, as well as two-time Oscar winner, Emmy winner and multiple Oscar and Emmy nominated actress Dianne Wiest, and (oh, yes, there is more) Tony and Emmy nominated thespian Patrick Wilson.  Wow.  That is a lot of high wattage talent.  And then there is Katie Holmes.

I like Katie - I do.  I thought she was great in the small independent movie Pieces of April (she was really quite good) and she certainly got noticed in The Ice Storm.  But, can she really compete with such major stars and trained theater professionals as Lithgow, Wiest and Wilson?  In one of the greatest plays of all time?  I am not 100% sure.  Did Dawson's Creek really serve as a fertile training ground for her stage and Broadway debut?  I worry that she will not have the chops for this.  I do, however, want to give her the benefit of the doubt.  We can't pre-judge her; we can only go buy tickets and check out her performance ourselves. 

I do have to fully register my objection to what I perceive as a calculated career move.  The whole thing just reeks of Nicole Kidman's arrival on B'way in the David Hare play The Blue Room during the ‘98/'99 Season.  Kidman garnered a ton of attention and it helped boost her movie career.  One can only assume that Ms. Holmes is hoping to make an equally big splash on the great white way and enhance her struggling movie profile.  I hope I am wrong and she is truly doing it for the love of theater; it just doesn't look that way.  But, what do I know?

One thing I know for sure - this is going to cause quite a stir on the rialto!  Times Square is going to go crazy for TomKat and baby Suri when they swoop into town.  Audiences will wonder nightly if Tom is in the audience watching.  Throngs of fans will crowd the stage door for a glimpse of post-show Katie.  The paparazzi will follow them all over town doing NYC type things (TomKat at the Met, TomKat at the Statue of Liberty, TomKat riding the crowded smelly subway at rush hour - oh wait, that's my life -scratch that).  New York has not seen drama this exciting in decades (if only it were on a stage).

No official dates have been announced (producers are eyeing a fall opening) and an actual theater has not been booked.  That being said I want to let Tom and Katie know that no matter which theater the show is booked in to, all the theaters in Times Square are within a 4 block radius of the Scientology Center on 46th Street.  It will be VERY convenient for a quick E-meter Audit between shows.

I tried to get through the whole post without a Scientology reference, but I couldn't do it.  I am weak.  I am very weak.  I do hope, however, that Ms. Holmes is strong.  In the coming months she is going to face a lot of speculation, gossip and criticism.  I truly wish her all the best and hope she knocks ‘em dead in the fall. 

 

~ See You On The Aisle
Bixby Elliot

 

Reader Comments

Paging Navigation

Showing 1 - 10 of 606

You must sign in to post a comment.

  • Svengali! This is almost as creepy as what Marilyn Manson is doing to that poor little girl he's attempting to recreate in the image of Ms Von Teese...

    Posted by gdl918 on 5/20/2008, 4:46 AM (Report Abuse)
  • Beware the response of offended Scientologists (one can only guess if they will prove to be a more vocal group than the pro-Clay Aiken fanatics. I can hear it now, legal action launched against Broadway Bixby for his discrimination against Tom and Katie's religion. "Would he say the same about a jew or christian on Broadway?" they'll ask. The answer: No, because those folks don't hustle in subways with "free personality tests" or get arrested for breaking into government facilities containing files on private citizens, or, or, or....

    But I digress. I still find that little Holmes gal to be a charmer so who knows how she'll do on "the broadway"

    Thanks for the fun post!

    Posted by theatergeek on 5/20/2008, 5:03 AM (Report Abuse)
  • i'm not so sure about john lithgow as joe keller - he seems all wrong for the part. and while i think patrick wilson is great...isn't he a little old for the part of chris?
    the only one who seems right for this is dianne wiest
    but....what do i know?

    Posted by bff on 5/20/2008, 7:31 AM (Report Abuse)
  • Ok, for fear of Xenu, I will not comment on the religion portion only to say who am I to judge, she might rock it!! Just looking forward to hearing ALL ABOUT IT RIGHT HERE:)

    Changing subject, this weekend I saw the tour of Wicked in KC. So it was ahhmazing but I was thinking what it would have been like to see the originals in action, KC and Idina. So...is there a single soul reading this blog that saw the original cast and would care to take a trip down memory lane for me?? Even you, almight Bix???

    Posted by AHmom on 5/20/2008, 8:52 AM (Report Abuse)
  • actually, katie holmes was a well known actress well before tom cruise came along as her husband, so the credibility of this article is kind of tainted for me.

    Posted by easymarshhead on 5/20/2008, 11:23 AM (Report Abuse)
  • that poor woman is tooooo skinnnnny! Gross!!! He likes them built like 11 year old girls!

    Posted by M C on 5/20/2008, 11:26 AM (Report Abuse)
  • Come on people, they have the same agents and they run in the same circles. Imagine you marry a man or woman with a past and a lot of connects don't you think they'd take you under their wing and try to make money and controversy off you too. That's Hollywood my dear!

    Posted by Rebecca G on 5/20/2008, 11:26 AM (Report Abuse)
  • I don't understand why this article is referring to Katie Holmes-Cruise as "Ms". Isn't that the title for a divorcee'? Also, who cares?

    Posted by whocares? on 5/20/2008, 11:29 AM (Report Abuse)
  • you must be a scientologist easymarshhead

    Posted by MrsB on 5/20/2008, 11:29 AM (Report Abuse)
  • It seems that all the women that Tom Cruise was ever with, were barely known until they started dating/married him. We heard these womens names once in awhile, but as soon as they were with him, their carriers took off. I think he's just a stepping stone to help get female stars careers started.

    Posted by belamiboi1976 on 5/20/2008, 11:30 AM (Report Abuse)
Paging Navigation

Showing 1 - 10 of 606

You must sign in to post a comment.